Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jaime Olaiz's avatar

Eduardo,

Excellent analysis this week. Your breakdown of the structural arithmetic Mexico faces is spot on, but it was your concluding metaphor that struck a literal chord with me: “the light is not at the end of any tunnel: no one is going to dig the exit for us.”

That line immediately brought to mind a massive civil engineering project right here on the border: the federal government’s initiative in Nogales, Sonora, to shift rail traffic away from the city center.

On paper, the concept isn't entirely without merit. However, in a region where economic resources are notoriously scarce, the opportunity cost is staggering. An investment of that magnitude would yield vastly superior returns for everyday citizens if it were directed toward pressing, foundational infrastructure—namely electricity grid distribution, reliable water and wastewater management, and basic road connectivity.

Instead, the strategy called for boring a literal tunnel through the Nogales hills to reconnect with the existing tracks just before the U.S.–Mexico border. Today, the project sits incomplete. A portion of the tunnel has been dug, but you literally cannot see the light on the other side because the exit doesn't exist yet.

It serves as a perfect, physical monument to a systemic flaw in Mexico’s current development strategy. Bypassing civil institutions and using the military to oversee large infrastructure projects strips away the transparency and accountability required to efficiently bring complex projects to fruition.

As you rightly noted, the turn is a decision. Until the strategy shifts toward transparent, rule-based delivery that prioritizes foundational public utilities, we will keep digging expensive tunnels with no light at the end of them.

Appreciate the sharp perspective as always.

Best regards,

Jaime Olaiz

Allen Zeesman's avatar

Another excellent issue, Eduardo.

One place where I see things a little differently is on Mexico’s identity. I tend to see Mexico less as part of a broad Latin American story and more as an essential North American nation whose future will increasingly be shaped by the continent it shares with Canada and the United States.

That doesn’t mean turning away from Latin America or denying its cultural ties. But geopolitics, economics, security, energy, infrastructure, and increasingly even innovation are asking Mexico to make a strategic choice about where it wants to build its future.

I suspect that question—whether Mexico ultimately chooses to think of itself primarily as a North American country or a Latin American one—may become one of the defining debates of the next generation. I’d be very interested in your thoughts.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?